Interfaz traducida; las descripciones editoriales y los datos conservan su idioma original. Las reseñas nunca se traducen.

Douay-Rheims Bible (DRB) , 1749 to 1752 Challoner revision

Traducción de la Biblia

Qué se evalúa: El texto de la traducción y la revisión seleccionada. El tamaño de letra, los márgenes y la encuadernación pertenecen a una edición impresa concreta.

Las revisiones del texto y las ediciones impresas son distintas. El tamaño de letra y los márgenes se indican más abajo por editorial e ISBN. Ver ediciones impresas →

English College at Douai, Catholic seminary · Challoner revision of 1749 to 1752 · public domain

Edición 1749 to 1752 Challoner revision , current1582 Rheims New Testament , historical1609 Douay Old Testament , historical

Verificación de fuentes pendiente

Escribir una reseña
¿Volverías a usarlo? Sí No Inicia sesión con REVA para votar.

Comparar con otra

Community track

Todavía no hay suficientes respuestas contadas

0 respuestas contadas · pocas

La proporción aparece con 3 respuestas contadas. How this is computed

Los resultados acreditados aparecen con 3 reseñas contadas. Los grupos nunca se mezclan.

Verificar

Scores and meters here are recomputed from the public vote log. This listing has 1 events in it; the whole log has 140, with state hash 1d39701efc13bae6a2521aafddb90f0a819613002d8a05a2f454c9edf374cf73.

On-chain anchoring is not active on this deployment yet. The hash chain is live and verifiable on its own.

Recalcula los resultados: los eventos de este listado, la exportación completa, el programa y el contrato.

Meters · 0 reseñas escritas contadas

Ningún extremo es mejor. Cada medidor se ajusta hacia 3,0 con C = 7.

Legibilidad

sin reseñas contadas todavía

DensaFácil

Sensación literal o idiomática

sin reseñas contadas todavía

LiteralIdiomática

Ayudas de estudio

sin reseñas contadas todavía

EscasasAmplias

Sensación devocional o académica

sin reseñas contadas todavía

DevocionalAcadémica

Fidelity questions are answered by the spec sheet and the Disputes panel below, never by a number.

Ficha técnica

Los datos incluyen sus fuentes. La fecha aparece solo después de verificarlos; los datos pendientes están marcados. Nada aquí es una calificación.

Made by

Published by the English College at Rheims (New Testament, 1582) and at Douay (Old Testament, 1609); revised and compared with the Latin Vulgate by Bishop Richard Challoner in 1749 to 1752

Verificación pendiente
Sitio web oficial

https://www.drbo.org/

Verificación pendiente
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Idiomas

Inglés

Verificación pendiente
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Público previsto

Verificación pendiente
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Nombre completo

Douay-Rheims Bible

Verificación pendiente
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Abreviatura

DRB

Verificación pendiente
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Idioma de la traducción

Inglés

Verificación pendiente
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Enfoque de traducción

Word-for-word from the Latin: Baronius Press says it was translated quite literally and with great reverence for each individual word from the Vulgate

Verificación pendiente
Old Testament textual basis

The Latin Vulgate (Clementine edition), not the Hebrew; Challoner's revision was compared with the Vulgate

Verificación pendiente
New Testament textual basis

The Latin Vulgate (Clementine edition), not the Greek

Verificación pendiente
Canon and included books

Catholic, 73 books, including the seven deuterocanonical books

Verificación pendiente
Copyright and permissions

Public domain; the 1899 John Murphy Company edition may be quoted or reprinted freely

Verificación pendiente
First published

New Testament 1582 at Rheims; Old Testament 1609 at Douay; Challoner revision 1749 to 1752; the 1899 Baltimore edition carries the imprimatur of Cardinal Gibbons

Verificación pendiente

Aún faltan por investigar 38 campos. La información ausente no significa no, gratis ni seguro.

Evidencia original de la ficha
DatoValorFuente · consultada
Made byPublished by the English College at Rheims (New Testament, 1582) and at Douay (Old Testament, 1609); revised and compared with the Latin Vulgate by Bishop Richard Challoner in 1749 to 1752 Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verificación pendiente
Translation philosophyWord-for-word from the Latin: Baronius Press says it was translated quite literally and with great reverence for each individual word from the Vulgate Baronius Press, Douay-Rheims Bible · Verificación pendiente
Textual basis, Old TestamentThe Latin Vulgate (Clementine edition), not the Hebrew; Challoner's revision was compared with the Vulgate Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verificación pendiente
Textual basis, New TestamentThe Latin Vulgate (Clementine edition), not the Greek Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verificación pendiente
CanonCatholic, 73 books, including the seven deuterocanonical books Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verificación pendiente
Reading grade levelNo published figure Publisher pages checked · not published
Gender languageNot published Publisher pages checked · not published
CommitteeMembers of the English College at Douai, principally Gregory Martin; revised by Bishop Richard Challoner; names and numbers beyond that are not published on the pages checked Bible Gateway, Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition · Verificación pendiente
Notes in the textBishop Challoner's notes are printed in the text in italics; the online edition keeps the wording of the 1899 edition unchanged Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verificación pendiente
LicencePublic domain; the 1899 John Murphy Company edition may be quoted or reprinted freely Bible Gateway, Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition · Verificación pendiente
First publishedNew Testament 1582 at Rheims; Old Testament 1609 at Douay; Challoner revision 1749 to 1752; the 1899 Baltimore edition carries the imprimatur of Cardinal Gibbons Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verificación pendiente

What the maker discloses about itself (not a rating): Tradition: clearTextual basis: clearPhilosophy: clearCommittee: partlyFunding: n/a

Pedir una corrección · Are you the maker? Reclamar o corregir este listado

Ediciones impresas

El tamaño de letra, los márgenes, el papel y la encuadernación corresponden a una edición concreta. Estos ejemplos documentados no incluyen todas las impresiones.

Aún no se han documentado ediciones impresas concretas para esta ficha.

Sugerir una edición impresa o corregir sus datos →

Controversias y contexto

Editorial

We describe each dispute, attribute each position, and take no side.

The Vulgate as the basis

The Douay-Rheims was translated from the Latin Vulgate rather than from the Hebrew and Greek. Baronius Press and the Douay-Rheims Bible Online say the Council of Trent declared the Vulgate the Church’s authentic text in 1546, and that Jerome’s Latin reflects the structure of the original languages closely. Newer Catholic translations take the other view in practice: the bishops’ preface to the New American Bible says that after Pius XII’s 1943 encyclical the translators abandoned work based on the Vulgate and translated from the Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, and the Augustine Institute says the ESV Catholic Edition is translated directly from more reliable manuscripts than older English translations. Readers who prefer the Douay-Rheims value its fidelity to the Vulgate; readers of the newer translations value the original-language texts.

Guía

Maker reply: none yet · Objetar esta descripción

Reseñas

0 reseñas published. 0 published but not counted. 0 removed for policy reasons.

No reviews on this tab yet.

Preguntas frecuentes

Answered from the spec sheet and the positions above, never from the meters.

What text is it based on?

The Latin Vulgate, in the Clementine edition, for both Testaments. The disputes panel describes the disagreement over translating from the Vulgate rather than the Hebrew and Greek.

Is it word for word?

Yes by Baronius Press’s description, which calls it a quite literal translation of the Vulgate. The literal-to-idiomatic meter shows where readers place its feel.

Is it approved for Catholic use?

Yes. It has the 73-book Catholic canon, and the 1899 edition that current printings reproduce carries the imprimatur of Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop of Baltimore.

Which text do most printings carry?

The Challoner revision of 1749 to 1752, usually as printed in the 1899 Baltimore edition. The 1582 and 1609 originals are reprinted for study and differ in spelling and wording.

Who translated it?

Members of the English College at Douai, principally Gregory Martin, in the sixteenth century; Bishop Richard Challoner revised the text in the eighteenth.

Esta página en JSON