Douay-Rheims Bible (DRB) , 1582 Rheims New Testament

Bible translation

Review scope: The translation text and selected text revision. Font size, margins and binding belong to a specific printed edition.

Text revisions and printed editions are separate. Font size and margins are listed by publisher and ISBN below. See printed editions →

English College at Douai, Catholic seminary · Challoner revision of 1749 to 1752 · public domain

Edition 1749 to 1752 Challoner revision , current1582 Rheims New Testament , historical1609 Douay Old Testament , historical

Scores and reviews below describe the selected historical edition. The sourced facts describe the current edition.

Pending source verification

Write a review
Would you use this again? Yes No Sign in with REVA to vote.

Compare with another

Community track

Not enough counted responses yet

0 counted responses · few

The headline share appears at 3 counted responses. How this is computed

Vetted results appear at 3 counted written reviews. Tracks are never blended.

Verify

Scores and meters here are recomputed from the public vote log. This listing has 1 events in it; the whole log has 140, with state hash 1d39701efc13bae6a2521aafddb90f0a819613002d8a05a2f454c9edf374cf73.

On-chain anchoring is not active on this deployment yet. The hash chain is live and verifiable on its own.

Recompute this yourself: the events for this listing, the full export, the script and the contract.

Meters · 0 written reviews counted

Neither end is better. Each meter is shrunk toward 3.0 with C = 7.

Readability

no counted reviews yet

DenseEasy

Literal to idiomatic feel

no counted reviews yet

LiteralIdiomatic

Study helps

no counted reviews yet

BareExtensive

Devotional to academic feel

no counted reviews yet

DevotionalAcademic

Fidelity questions are answered by the spec sheet and the Disputes panel below, never by a number.

Spec sheet

Source links are provided for facts. A fetched date appears only after verification; pending facts are labeled. Nothing here is a rating.

Made by

Published by the English College at Rheims (New Testament, 1582) and at Douay (Old Testament, 1609); revised and compared with the Latin Vulgate by Bishop Richard Challoner in 1749 to 1752

Verification pending
Official website

https://www.drbo.org/

Verification pending
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Languages

English

Verification pending
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Intended audience

Verification pending
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Full name

Douay-Rheims Bible

Verification pending
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Abbreviation

DRB

Verification pending
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Translation language

English

Verification pending
Existing editorial catalog metadata
Translation approach explanation

Word-for-word from the Latin: Baronius Press says it was translated quite literally and with great reverence for each individual word from the Vulgate

Verification pending
Old Testament textual basis

The Latin Vulgate (Clementine edition), not the Hebrew; Challoner's revision was compared with the Vulgate

Verification pending
New Testament textual basis

The Latin Vulgate (Clementine edition), not the Greek

Verification pending
Canon and included books

Catholic, 73 books, including the seven deuterocanonical books

Verification pending
Copyright and permissions

Public domain; the 1899 John Murphy Company edition may be quoted or reprinted freely

Verification pending
First published

New Testament 1582 at Rheims; Old Testament 1609 at Douay; Challoner revision 1749 to 1752; the 1899 Baltimore edition carries the imprimatur of Cardinal Gibbons

Verification pending

38 fields still need research. Missing details are not treated as no, free, or safe.

Original listing evidence
FactValueSource · fetched
Made byPublished by the English College at Rheims (New Testament, 1582) and at Douay (Old Testament, 1609); revised and compared with the Latin Vulgate by Bishop Richard Challoner in 1749 to 1752 Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verification pending
Translation philosophyWord-for-word from the Latin: Baronius Press says it was translated quite literally and with great reverence for each individual word from the Vulgate Baronius Press, Douay-Rheims Bible · Verification pending
Textual basis, Old TestamentThe Latin Vulgate (Clementine edition), not the Hebrew; Challoner's revision was compared with the Vulgate Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verification pending
Textual basis, New TestamentThe Latin Vulgate (Clementine edition), not the Greek Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verification pending
CanonCatholic, 73 books, including the seven deuterocanonical books Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verification pending
Reading grade levelNo published figure Publisher pages checked · not published
Gender languageNot published Publisher pages checked · not published
CommitteeMembers of the English College at Douai, principally Gregory Martin; revised by Bishop Richard Challoner; names and numbers beyond that are not published on the pages checked Bible Gateway, Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition · Verification pending
Notes in the textBishop Challoner's notes are printed in the text in italics; the online edition keeps the wording of the 1899 edition unchanged Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verification pending
LicencePublic domain; the 1899 John Murphy Company edition may be quoted or reprinted freely Bible Gateway, Douay-Rheims 1899 American Edition · Verification pending
First publishedNew Testament 1582 at Rheims; Old Testament 1609 at Douay; Challoner revision 1749 to 1752; the 1899 Baltimore edition carries the imprimatur of Cardinal Gibbons Douay-Rheims Bible Online, about · Verification pending

What the maker discloses about itself (not a rating): Tradition: clearTextual basis: clearPhilosophy: clearCommittee: partlyFunding: n/a

Request a correction · Are you the maker? Claim or correct this listing

Printed editions

Font size, writing margins, paper and binding belong to an identified published edition. These documented examples do not cover every printing.

No specific printed editions have been documented for this listing yet.

Suggest a printed edition or correct its details →

Disputes and context

Editorial

We describe each dispute, attribute each position, and take no side.

The Vulgate as the basis

The Douay-Rheims was translated from the Latin Vulgate rather than from the Hebrew and Greek. Baronius Press and the Douay-Rheims Bible Online say the Council of Trent declared the Vulgate the Church’s authentic text in 1546, and that Jerome’s Latin reflects the structure of the original languages closely. Newer Catholic translations take the other view in practice: the bishops’ preface to the New American Bible says that after Pius XII’s 1943 encyclical the translators abandoned work based on the Vulgate and translated from the Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic, and the Augustine Institute says the ESV Catholic Edition is translated directly from more reliable manuscripts than older English translations. Readers who prefer the Douay-Rheims value its fidelity to the Vulgate; readers of the newer translations value the original-language texts.

Guide

Maker reply: none yet · Dispute this description

Reviews

0 reviews published. 0 published but not counted. 0 removed for policy reasons.

No reviews on this tab yet. Be the first: write a review.

The standing questions

Answered from the spec sheet and the positions above, never from the meters.

What text is it based on?

The Latin Vulgate, in the Clementine edition, for both Testaments. The disputes panel describes the disagreement over translating from the Vulgate rather than the Hebrew and Greek.

Is it word for word?

Yes by Baronius Press’s description, which calls it a quite literal translation of the Vulgate. The literal-to-idiomatic meter shows where readers place its feel.

Is it approved for Catholic use?

Yes. It has the 73-book Catholic canon, and the 1899 edition that current printings reproduce carries the imprimatur of Cardinal Gibbons, Archbishop of Baltimore.

Which text do most printings carry?

The Challoner revision of 1749 to 1752, usually as printed in the 1899 Baltimore edition. The 1582 and 1609 originals are reprinted for study and differ in spelling and wording.

Who translated it?

Members of the English College at Douai, principally Gregory Martin, in the sixteenth century; Bishop Richard Challoner revised the text in the eighteenth.

This page as JSON